Posts Tagged ‘Diabetes’

Nationwide Recall of AccuSure Insulin Syringes (January 2010)

Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010

Video originally created by FDA -- posted by Lawsuit.com on January 19, 2010

Qualitest Pharmaceuticals is recalling all lots of AccuSure insulin syringes because the syringe needle may detach from the syringe. If that happens, the needle could get stuck in the insulin vial, or get pushed back into the syringe, or even stay in the skin after injection.

The recalled AccuSure insulin Syringes were distributed to wholesale and retail pharmacies nationwide between January 2002 and October 2009. Anyone who has AccuSure insulin syringes should stop using them. For more information , call Qualitest at 1-800-444-4011.

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Recall of Medtronic Mini-Med Paradigm Quick Set Infusion Sets

Friday, September 11th, 2009

Video originally created by FDA -- posted by Lawsuit.com on September 3, 2009

In July, Medtronic recalled certain infusion sets which are used with the company’s Mini-Med Paradigm insulin pumps to deliver insulin to diabetic patients. Because of a manufacturing error, the vents on these sets may clog and then fail to equalize the air pressure in the reservoir compartment with the surrounding atmosphere. If this happens, the pump could deliver too much or too little insulin to the patient, and that could lead to serious injury or death.

The recall applies to the MiniMed Paradigm Quick-Set infusion sets with reference numbers MMT-396, MMT-397, MMT-398 or MMT-399 and with lot numbers starting with the number “8.” [Example: 8xxxxxx]. The lot number can be found on both the box label and on each infusion set package.

The firm is advising patients who have the recalled infusion sets to stop using them and to return them to the company for replacement at no additional charge. For more information contact Medtronic at 800-345-8139.

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Personal Injury: Med Mal & Nursing Home (3 out 3)

Friday, February 13th, 2009

Medical Malpractice Legal Responsibility:

Medical malpractice
state laws have been rewritten over the years which have led to restricted rights for injured consumers due to medical negligence. Severity in harm and supporting documentation are crucial elements to establish validity in claims. As Manuel L. Dobrinsky,Attorney at Law, of Miami Florida, adds, “Doctors today have many more patients to manage than they had in the past. Thus, the risk of a medical error is more likely than years ago. For this reason, it is important for consumers to take a vested interest in their healthcare by being inquisitive about their diagnosis, medications, treatment, and follow up. In doing so, patients can reduce the risk of potential life threatening illness that may otherwise result in a failure to diagnose or misdiagnose an illness. “
Connected Topics:Medical Malpractice

Nursing Home Abuse Accountability:

Nursing home liability refers to emotional, physical or neglectful acts against an elder by a nursing home employee(s). This may include: malnutrition, dehydration, bed sores, wandering off premises, falls, sexual assault, battery, and wrongful death. Skilled nursing and intermediate care facilities must meet criteria set by Medicare and Medicaid should they serve Medicare or Medicaid recipients. Other facilities that wish to accept Medicare patients must meet standards set by the Federal Medicare Health Insurance Program for the Aged. There are also nursing homes that do not accept Medicare patients which allow them to not fall under federal guidelines. State requirements vary among the states. In fact, certain attorneys are creating movements through state
legislature to improve nursing home abuse accountability. As John J. Perconti, Attorney at Law, Chicago, Illinois, explains, “Nursing home abuse has become more common in recent years. Yet, the laws do not reflect upon the needs of today. For example, nursing homes are not required to carry liability insurance. All nursing home residents and their families need to be informed that the nursing home facility does not have insurance. If there is no financial accountability for negligence, these residents will continue to be neglected and abused.  The rights of abused victims are restricted under the current system.” Currently, Illinois is in the process of passing a bill that would require liability insurance in nursing homes.
Connected Topics: Nursing Home Abuse

Premise Liability:

Property damage or bodily harm that occurs on a homeowner’s property maybe the responsibility of the homeowner where the
damage took place. Homeowner’s insurance policies are designed to provide compensation for damages associated with accidents, negligence, and other forms of harm. A government agency may be liable in some instances whereby the accident occurs on the property of the government. An example of this would be slip and fall that occur because of cracks in sidewalks, faulty curbs, potholes, defective crosswalks, flawed stairs on buses and the like.

Some of the more common injuries that result in premise liability include:dog bites, slip and falls, or any type of property that is termed an attractive nuisance liability which is an item that can harm children regardless of reasonable precautions taken to prevent injury. As Arnold Hernandez, Attorney at Law, of San Diego County, CA explains, “Premise liability is founded on the idea that we all owe a duty of care to our fellow human beings to insure that there are no hidden risks of personal injury on our property and that we have exercised reasonable care in insuring we have removed foreseeable risks. The duty of care is much higher when it comes to children that may come onto our property and we must anticipate how children will behave, including: children’s conduct that to an adult would seem irrational.”
Connected Topics: Dog Bites, Slip and Falls.

Terms for Liability:

Timeliness is important when it comes to liability. Every state has specific rules relating to the number of days that you are permitted to file a claim. It is important to seek the advice of an attorney as soon as you can after injury to provide substantial time necessary to uncover the circumstances surrounding the injury and determine validity for a claim. Once a claim is filed, there will be a select number of days to file a lawsuit. It is important to note that the date of harm may be considered the date of discovery which can sometime occur years after the actual injury. In some cases, both the injured party and the party being held liable are found negligent. This is called comparative negligence. In other cases, negligence may be strictly due to the injured party. Depending
upon the circumstances, personal injury attorneys may refuse to take such cases.

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Warning Added to Regranex Label (Aug. 2008)

Friday, December 5th, 2008

Video originally created by FDA -- posted by Lawsuit.com on August 12, 2008

A boxed warning alerting healthcare professionals to an increased risk of cancer death has been added to the labeling for Regranex (becaplermin), a topical medication used to treat certain diabetic foot and leg ulcers.Based on a review of an earlier epidemiologic study, FDA has concluded that patients who use three or more tubes of Regranex experience a five-fold increase in the risk of cancer death compared to patients who do not use the drug. The duration of the study was not long enough to establish whether there is also an increased risk of new cancers.In March 2008, FDA announced that it had received the epidemiologic study, described what the overall study findings were, and promised to analyze the study and communicate its findings to the healthcare community. The new boxed warning in the labeling is the result of that analysis.Foot ulcers are a serious problem among diabetics, and yet there are few treatment options. FDA says that Regranex can be effective when it is used along with good ulcer care practices, such as controlling infection, removing dead tissue and relieving pressure. However, the boxed warning says that Regranex should only be used when the benefits are expected to outweigh the risks, and that it should be used with caution in patients with known malignancies.

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Byetta Lawsuits Prompted Due To Heart Attack and Stroke Victims

Friday, December 5th, 2008

The first question that may come to mind about Byetta is “Why we would need another diabetes medication choice with the great number of choices we have in diabetes medications today?” The second question that remains is “What did the manufacturer know about the injectible Byetta drug before they changed their box warning label in 2007?” The third question becomes “Of the 1 million Byetta users since 2005, how many have developed serious adverse reactions due to the drug?” The serious conditions that may result from the use of Byetta include:

• Heart Attack
• Stroke
• Hemorrhagic Pancreatitis
• Necrotizing Pancreatitis

The Physical Warning Signs of Adverse Byetta Effects
• Abdominal pain�
• Back pain
• Nausea�
• Extreme Blood Pressure Levels
• Elevated Heart Rates

The Public Health Community Warnings
The final question becomes “What has the public health community and the pharmaceutical manufacturer of Byetta done to protect the public?” 
In August of 2007, the FDA issued an alert regarding the safety of Byetta. In December of 2007, Amylin Pharmaceutical made changes to the product label to disclose the risk of two types of pancreatitis which may be life threatening. Hemorrhagic pancreatitis may cause severe bleeding and deterioration of the blood vessels.   Necrotizing pancreatitis is characterized by the release of toxins into the blood stream that may result in many organs failing and ultimate death. Amylin also sent letters of notice to approximately 100,000 physicians across the U.S. warning them about the risks associated with the drug. It is still not clear how many more people will be injured by Byetta. There have been reports that adverse conditions may not appear for months after beginning the use of Byetta. As Rachel Abrams, Attorney at Law of San Francisco explains, “People seeking legal advice because of using Byetta were unaware of the risk of pancreatitis. The physicians were unaware as well. Unfortunately the side effects may appear mild initially, but become life threatening, particularly when the symptoms are not diagnosed or treated.”

Many personal injury attorneys feel that the number of Byetta victims will continue to rise as more consumers become aware of the association between their health conditions and the drug. Some personal injury attorneys contend that Byetta lawsuits will be multi-district in nature. The verdict regarding Byetta lawsuits may not be out for some time. In the meantime, consumers need to be continued to be warned about Byetta.

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)