Posts Tagged ‘personal injury attorney’

KTM Off-Road Motorcycle Recall

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

KTM, maker of the defective off road motorcycle, conducted a voluntarily RECALL OF THE 2009 OFF ROAD MOTORCYCLES, in cooperation with The Consumer Product and Safety Commission. The recall was initiated because of the undue risk for injury or death from the motorcycle’s front fork failure. Consumers are advised to immediately stop using the off road motorcycle.

The KTM recall involves approximately 550 2009 Off Road Motorcycle models in orange and black, including: 125SX, 150SX, 250XC-W, and 300XC-W. The defective models were manufactured in Austria and sold in the U.S. from December of 2008 through April 2009. The hazard that has been identified is associated with the front fork inner tube. The front fork inner tube may crack and dislodge from the fork axle. The breakage of the inner tube poses a risk of injury or death to the driver or people surrounding the driver at the time of the breakage. The off road motorcycle costs between $6000. and $8000. Consumers are advised to immediately stop using the off road motorcycle, contact KTM at (888) 985-6090 for a free repair, or visit the KTM North America Inc., of Amherst, Ohio website.

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Intelence HIV Users and SJS Lawsuits

Friday, September 11th, 2009

Risk of Steven’s Johnson Syndrome Uncovered

Intelence, manufactured by Tibotec Therapeutics, is a drug for people with HIV that has now been found to be associated with Steven’s Johnson Syndrome, a rare life threatening blistering and skin death condition, as well as erythema multiforme and toxic epidermal necrolysis (an advanced SJS condition).  Tibotec Therapeutics, a subsidiary of Johnson and Johnson, together with the Food and Drug Administration joined forces to alert infectious disease physicians so that they may be able to better educate candidates for Intelence. There will be a text change to the warning label of the Intelence bottle to alert consumers of the latest side effect as well.

Since January of 2008 when Intelence was first introduced to the market, there have been two reports of severe reaction and one death following use. Of the two suffering serious injury, one has seriously suffered from SJS and the other, SJS and liver failure. People using Intelence at this time may not be fully ware of the risks. People who are having any type of skin reaction during the use of Intelence should contact their physician immediately and inquire about changing medications.

Steven’s Johnson Syndrome can be a highly debilitating condition that affects people in varying degrees. In some cases, people experience blistering and skin death that progresses over time. People withsevere SJS are often treated in a burn unit to manage skin death which potentially leads to the person’s death when unresponsive to treatment.

At this time, it is not known how many other people will be affected by SJS, erythema multiforme and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Thus, it is unknown if, when or how many lawsuits against Intelence makers will follow.

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Diabetic Alert: Glucose Test Strips May be Faulty

Thursday, September 3rd, 2009

GDH-PQQ glucose test strips produced false high glucose readings that resulted in inappropriate insulin delivery and hypoglycemia, coma and death for some people with diabetes. The FDA gathered fatality reports involving the use of GDH-PQQ glucose test strips to help identify the common risk associated with the test strips.

The risk is specific to people that receive certain therapeutic sugar containing products or non-glucose sugars such as maltose, galactose and xylose. Apparently, the combination of insulin and these products produces a false high reading on the test strip report that triggers diabetics to inject inappropriate levels of insulin. People who are likely to use products that produce the risky sugar combination may be on peritoneal dialysis or have had recent surgery. Though, other people outside of these tow categories may be at risk.

We encourage people to share this information with friends, particularly elders who are less likely to be informed about defective products such as this. Our goal is to broaden consumer awareness to limit personal injury for diabetics. If you or a loved one has been injured by the GDH-PQQ glucose test strips, we encourage you to contact an attorney to learn about your legal rights.

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Railroad Workers: Only Remedy for Job Related Injuries

Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009

By Lesley Ranft

Railroad workers compensation for injuries is unlike most any other industry worker who become injured on the job.  Whereas, injuries sustained during work hours are traditionally compensated through worker’s compensation, injured railroad workers do not have the ability to proceed with worker’s compensation claims. Some typical railroad worker injuries include:

  • Carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Exposure to asbestos
  • Exposure to noise
  • Spinal injuries
  • Soft tissue and joint injuries to the elbows, shoulders, hands, and feet.

Many railroad workers experience injuries due to their career long exposure to asbestos, noise, or the risk factors for the development of cumulative trauma disorders to their spines and hips.  These railroad workers have often worked 25 or 30 years at the same job.  Frequently, they are between 50-60 years old.  Many of them undergo surgery to alleviate their pain and attempt to get back to work.  In some cases they may never be able to return to their lifelong job. This is unfortunate, particularly when compared to the benefits provided to workers in other industries through worker’s compensation. Worker’s compensation may provide for vocational retraining, job placement assistance, disability payments and pain and suffering compensation. David Lockard, an attorney in Philadelphia, who focuses on representing railroad workers, explained: “Too often, railroad workers are forced off the railroad because there are no accommodations provided for their disabilities.” So, what can railroad workers do if they are injured?

The only opportunity for remedy from a railroad worker injury is to identify negligence of the railroad, which involves an intensive investigation and filing suit in state or federal court. As David Lockard adds, “To identify negligence on the part of the railroad for a cumulative type musculoskeletal injury, it is necessary to retain an expert in ergonomics who can assess whether a job exposed a railroad worker to risk factors such as repetition, force, awkward posture or vibration.”

Only a few lawyers dedicate their practice to representing injured railroad workers.  Even fewer focus on representing railroad workers who have been injured due to cumulative exposure to factors such as asbestos, noise, or years of vibration.  Lawsuits for railroad workers assist in drawing attention to the need for improvements to prevent others from injury. Lawsuits for railroad workers may provide for financial compensation to replace income loss from job loss and disability.

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Gas Tank Explosions Trigger Lawsuits

Friday, June 12th, 2009

 
Gas tanks have had a track record of redesign and altered placement location since the mid 1900’s. This is because of the high number of car and truck accidents or faulty fuel lines that have resulted in gas tank explosion over time. In 2003, Clarence Diltlow, Executive Director the Center for Auto Safety, submitted testimony to the New York State Senate Committee to bring additional attention to the unnecessary risk of severe burn and burn related death from gas tank explosion. The following points were driven home.

·   The engineering required to enable survival from an 80 mph rear impact accident is more difficult than the engineering required to prevent a fire in an 80 mph rear impact accident. Yet some car and truck manufacturers omitted engineering that would otherwise prevent gas tank explosions and death.

·   Many high speed crashes would have been survivable if the gas tank did not explode.

·   Ford’s 1992‑97 Crown Victoria has a fatal burn related crash rate of close to 5 times greater than comparable 1985‑96 Chevrolet Impalas and Caprices.

Ford Pintos of the 1970’s have also been linked to gas tank explosion. Explosions that become unavoidable are often related to the location of the gas tank. Gas tanks that are mounted between the rear axle and bumper create a grave risk. General Motors settled nearly 300 legal cases involving pick up truck passenger burns and burn related deaths because of design defect. The settlements totaled over $495 million dollars. Since 2003, the number of complaints of injury or death from gas tank explosions has continued to grow. People who have suffered because of a gas tank explosion incident should contact a personal injury attorney to learn more about legal rights for a lawsuit against the car manufacturer.

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)