Posts Tagged ‘Safety’

KTM Off-Road Motorcycle Recall

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

KTM, maker of the defective off road motorcycle, conducted a voluntarily RECALL OF THE 2009 OFF ROAD MOTORCYCLES, in cooperation with The Consumer Product and Safety Commission. The recall was initiated because of the undue risk for injury or death from the motorcycle’s front fork failure. Consumers are advised to immediately stop using the off road motorcycle.

The KTM recall involves approximately 550 2009 Off Road Motorcycle models in orange and black, including: 125SX, 150SX, 250XC-W, and 300XC-W. The defective models were manufactured in Austria and sold in the U.S. from December of 2008 through April 2009. The hazard that has been identified is associated with the front fork inner tube. The front fork inner tube may crack and dislodge from the fork axle. The breakage of the inner tube poses a risk of injury or death to the driver or people surrounding the driver at the time of the breakage. The off road motorcycle costs between $6000. and $8000. Consumers are advised to immediately stop using the off road motorcycle, contact KTM at (888) 985-6090 for a free repair, or visit the KTM North America Inc., of Amherst, Ohio website.

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Baby Teethers and Bacteria Don’t Mix: Luv N’Care, LTD RECALL

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

A nationwide recall of the numerous types of the Luv N’ Care Baby Teether was necessary because the teethers’ gel was stricken with Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus circulans. This was a precautionary measure for select lots of the Gel Filled Teethers,Cottontails and Playschool Teethers. The risk of injury from the teeth may occur when the gel is punctured and gel seepage comes in contact with the skin or is ingested. In this case, children may experience abdominal pain, vomiting and diarrhea, but the bacterium does not cause usually illness in people that do not have immunosuppressive illnesses. The alert was identified after the FDA found Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus circulans, in the gel in samples of teethers they were testing.

UPC code

48526-00451 Nuby

48526-00452 Nuby

48526-00453 Nuby

48526-00454 Nuby

48526-00455 Nuby

48526-00459 Nuby

48526-00467 Nuby

48526-00472 Nuby

48526-00473 Nuby

48526-00482 Nuby

48526-00483 Nuby

48526-00487 Nuby

48526-00490 Nuby

48526-00519 Nuby

48526-00521 Nuby

41520-87115 Cottontails

50428-91511 Playschool

41520-91660 Cottontails

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Bench Press and Treadmill Recall Due to Serious Injury Risks

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

Nautilus’ Bowflex Ultimate Fitness Machines (XL, XTL and XTLU), Power Pro and Icon Health’s Pro Form Treadmill have been recalled due to the risk of parts breakage or dysfunction that pose a risk for injury to the back, neck, head, shoulders, teeth, arms, hand, fingers, legs, feet, and toes. There have also been reports of bone fractures as well as bodily cuts, burns and blisters.

The total numbers of units that are associated with injury due to defect are well over 1 million. There have been approximately 100 reports of serious injury to date. Nautilus began selling its defective products in January 1995. The defects that have been reported while people were using the equipment include:

  • Seat pin breakage or disengagement, resulting in sudden instability of the seat
  • Incline bench support bracket breakage, leading to instant bench instability
  • Backboard bench breakage, resulting in abrupt movement of the bench
  • Lat Tower rotation and falling, resulting in an unexpected drop of the equipment from the top of the apparatus.

People who have recalled fitness equipment may contact the manufacturer about compensation for the faulty equipment. People who have suffered serious injury because of the defective fitness equipment may seek out the advice of a personal injury attorney to initiate a lawsuit against the fitness equipment manufacturer.

 

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Gas Tank Explosions Trigger Lawsuits

Friday, June 12th, 2009

 
Gas tanks have had a track record of redesign and altered placement location since the mid 1900’s. This is because of the high number of car and truck accidents or faulty fuel lines that have resulted in gas tank explosion over time. In 2003, Clarence Diltlow, Executive Director the Center for Auto Safety, submitted testimony to the New York State Senate Committee to bring additional attention to the unnecessary risk of severe burn and burn related death from gas tank explosion. The following points were driven home.

·   The engineering required to enable survival from an 80 mph rear impact accident is more difficult than the engineering required to prevent a fire in an 80 mph rear impact accident. Yet some car and truck manufacturers omitted engineering that would otherwise prevent gas tank explosions and death.

·   Many high speed crashes would have been survivable if the gas tank did not explode.

·   Ford’s 1992‑97 Crown Victoria has a fatal burn related crash rate of close to 5 times greater than comparable 1985‑96 Chevrolet Impalas and Caprices.

Ford Pintos of the 1970’s have also been linked to gas tank explosion. Explosions that become unavoidable are often related to the location of the gas tank. Gas tanks that are mounted between the rear axle and bumper create a grave risk. General Motors settled nearly 300 legal cases involving pick up truck passenger burns and burn related deaths because of design defect. The settlements totaled over $495 million dollars. Since 2003, the number of complaints of injury or death from gas tank explosions has continued to grow. People who have suffered because of a gas tank explosion incident should contact a personal injury attorney to learn more about legal rights for a lawsuit against the car manufacturer.

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Bridgestone Motorcycle Tire Recall Update

Monday, May 18th, 2009

In April 2009, The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reported that Bridgestone Americas Tire Operation (BATO) recalled select Bridgestone Exedra G850 G motorcycle tires, size 180/70R16 77H. These motorcycle tires were originally sold for 2008 and 2009 Triumph Rocket III Touring motorcycle models.

The defect of the tires relates to the risk of torque-induced degradation in the body ply which may result in the inner lining cracking and a leak in the rear tire. The tires may vibrate at low to moderate speeds. The defect creates a risk of injury or death to the driver and individuals surrounding the vehicle. Consumers are advised to immediately stop using the affected tires, contact Bridgestone for a free replacement of both front and rear tires at (800) 465-1904. The recall commenced in April 2009.

VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.5.6_840]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)